Tuesday, March 25, 2003

Bush's lies about Iraq

The Bush administration has repeatedly lied about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and Iraqi ties to Al Qaeda in order to build support for the war.

Related articles:

Friday, March 21, 2003

Is the war legal?

According to many interpreters of International Law, the U.S. led invasion of Iraq is illegal.

Related articles:

Thursday, March 20, 2003

The invasion of Iraq: an unjust war

Last night (U.S. time), the United States and Great Britain began their military assault on Iraq. This war is unwise as it will likely inflame anti-American attitudes and increase risk of terrorism on Westerners. The war is unjust because it will result in the death and destruction of innocent peoples lives. The war is unnecessary because Iraq does not pose an imminent threat and the war will not lead to a more peaceful and democratic Middle East. German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder states, "My question was and remains: does the extent of the threat posed by the Iraqi dictator justify the imposition of war which will result in the certain death of thousands of innocent men, women and children? My answer in this case was and remains: no."

The U.S. government was never interested in working with the UN inspectors and did not provide them with useful intelligence. UN chief weapons inspector Hans Blix has questioned US intentions regarding inspections. Blix stated that "I somewhat doubt that when (the Security Council) got the resolution last November they really intended to give under three-and-a-half months for inspections." Furthormore, Blix states, "We did not have any obstacles from the Iraqi side in going anywhere. They gave us prompt access and we were in a great many places all over Iraq" (BBC News). Blix questioned the information passed on to the inspection teams from US intelligence service.

The fact is that if they had been given a real chance, inspections would likely have been successful. According to the Washington Post, referring to the 1991-1998 inspection period: "[U]nder UN supervision, Iraq destroyed 817 of 819 proscribed medium-range missiles, 14 launchers, 9 trailers and 56 fixed missile-launch sites. It also destroyed 73 of 75 chemical or biological warheads and 163 warheads for conventional explosives. UN inspectors also supervised destruction of 88,000 filled and unfilled chemical munitions, more than 600 tons of weaponized and bulk chemical weapons agents, 4,000 tons of precursor chemicals and 980 pieces of equipment considered key to production of such weapons." The UN inspections did not fail; the US failed the UN inspections by not allowing it to proceed.

One of the major justifications given for the war has been the notion that it will foster the spread of democracy in the region. But as the Los Angeles Times reports, "A classified State Department report expresses doubt that installing a new regime in Iraq will foster the spread of democracy in the Middle East.... The report, which has been distributed to a small group of top government officials but not publicly disclosed, says that daunting economic and social problems are likely to undermine basic stability in the region for years, let alone prospects for democratic reform." Given the US government's history of supporting undemocratic and oppressive regimes, it seems unlikely that democracy will flourish under an American installed Iraqi government.

Related articles:

Tuesday, March 18, 2003

Rachel Corrie

I've been reading about Rachel Corrie, the American activist killed March 16 in Rafah, Gaza Strip by an Israeli military bulldozer. She was in the Gaza Strip as a member of the International Solidarity Movement, a Palistinian organization that organizes non-violent resistance to the Israeli occupation. She was attempting to save a Palestinian family's house from demolition by using her "white person privilege" by placing her body in front of the bulldozer. Corrie's parents have released emails she sent them from Gaza. They provide a stark picture of life there and an explanation of why and what she was doing there.

Corrie is the first American activist to be killed defending human rights in Palestine, but not the first person to die there from a bulldozer. The Israeli army regularly demolishes homes of Palestineans with armed bulldozers. Just two weeks earlier an Israeli bulldozer killed Nuha Sweidan, a nine-month pregnant Palestinian women. According to the Palestinian Ministry of Health, in the past month Israeli assaults have killed 82 Palestinians and have wounded an additional 616. These killings are the result of an escalation of Israeli military assaults on civilians. Military attacks like these are a direct violation of International law.

This occurs on the eve of a war with Iraq. In his address to the nation Monday night, Bush stated, "The United States, with other countries, will work to advance liberty and peace in that region [the Middle East]." If the U.S. government was really interested in working to advance liberty and peace in the Middle East, they would end their support of the Israeli military, demand an investigation into Israeli war crimes (such as the death of Rachel Corrie and the massacres that occurred in Jenin and Nablus last year), demand an end to the the occupation of Palestine, and support the immediate creation of a Palestinian State.

Related sites:
Related articles:

Thursday, March 13, 2003

In a world gone mad

The rap group the Beastie Boys have released an anti-war track called "In a World Gone Mad." You can download the song for free from their website, and read the lyrics here.