Tuesday, December 10, 2002

Bush's Smoking Gun Hypocrisy

By now it is well known that U.S. President Bush's main line for supporting a pre-emptive attack on Iraq is because "we don't want to wait for a smoking gun." In other words, the Bush regime believes it doesn't need to produce evidence that the Iraqi regime has developed weapons of mass destruction and that the American public and the international community should take Bush's word for it. In fact, the Bush administration is now saying that the U.N. weapons inspectors will probably not find evidence.

But Bush is not always so proactive. When pulling out of the Kyoto treaty on global warming, he contended that more research was needed into the causes of climate change before governments could decide on appropriate solutions. But there is ample evidence demonstrating that there is global warming. And even if the effects are not entirely known, we should not wait for a "smoking gun" when it comes to the environment we all must share.

Related articles:


Related sites:

U.S. Politics: Cultural insensitivity in Washington

Senate majority leader Trent Lott's racist comment has rightly created controversy. Lott stated that he supported outgoing Republican Senator Strom Thurmond's 1948 presidential candidacy and that "if the rest of the country had followed our lead we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years." He has since apologized for the "misunderstanding" and "poor choice of words." His poor choice of words can only be interpreted as supporting racial segregation.

John Snow, the newly nominated Treasury Secretary, was sensitive enough to resign from a golf club that excludes women. The Augusta National golf club, where the Master's golf tournament is played, has been in the news recently for it's discrimination policy towards women. So when the new Treasury Secretary resigned from the golf club (on his own accord, we are told by White House spokesman Ari Fleisher), we are reassured (confirmed by the mainstream media) that controversy has been averted. But should we not ask why, if he knew that it was an issue, he would wait until he was nominated for a high ranking government post before resigning? If he personally thought that discrimination against women is problematic, why not as a member try to change it? It is obvious that his resignation from the sexist, discriminatory golf club was only done to save face.

In both the cases of Trent Lott's blatant racism and John Snow's complicity with a sexist institution we can find, fully exposed, values that are often covered up with such face saving moves as apologizing for being racist. Apology not accepted.


Update: While controversy never really developed regarding John Snow's association with the discriminatory Golf Club, it continues to surround Trent Lott regarding his blatantly racist comments even receiving condemnations from President Bush. The related articles below have been updated to include recent coverage.

Related articles: